Archive for March, 2007

America’s Mayor? What does that say about America?

Friday, March 30th, 2007

In today's headlines: "Giuliani Faces Questions About 9/11"

Former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, who has been riding his persona as a 9/11 hero in his campaign for presidency, is coming under criticism by the families of deceased New York firefighters for his performance leading up to, during, and after that very event--most notably his administration's failure to provide the city's first responders with adequate radios, which could have been a factor in their deaths.

Clearly, not spending the money to ensure the safety of those who work for the safety of others is an important leadership failure. What really caught my eye, however, was a statement by one complainant (a woman whose son, a firefighter, died in the World Trade Center on 9/11):

"If Rudolph Giuliani was running on anything but 9/11, I would not speak out. If he ran on cleaning up Times Square, getting rid of squeegee men, lowering crime - that's indisputable."

This has long been Giuliani's reputation. He was celebrated as "the man who cleaned up New York" long before he was hailed as "America's Mayor" for 9/11. But one must ask: if he cleaned up the city of all these homeless and despondent people, where did they go?

Karla Bertrand of Brown University knows where.

So did Robert Lederman, an artist who had been one of those homeless.

The thought that Rudy Giuliani would run on these laurels should disturb people much more than running on a faulted performance on 9/11. It's a sad but common thing for an administration to fail to account for and provide for some need within a department of that adminstration. While inexcusable, especially when it is associated with the loss of lives, there are countless leaders who could have made the same kind of mistake--as evidenced by the sorry failures at all levels in the response to Hurricane Katrina. In fact, no one person can take singlehanded charge or blame in a crisis like 9/11 or Katrina. But to systematically (and ethnically) "cleanse" a city of homeless people by arresting them and getting them out of sight instead of addressing the problems that lead to homelessness--all the while having the number of those homeless people increase because of your policies--takes a despicable mayor, and if you ask me, not a very good person, either.

So Rudy Giuliani's credibility on 9/11 isn't what it seemed. Does America still think he's credible on "cleaning up" New York?

And if he is America's Mayor, what does that say about America?

The Nation magazine: The New SDS

Friday, March 30th, 2007

The New SDS, by Christopher Phelps, writing in The Nation:

Angry at the Iraq debacle, emboldened by the Bush-Cheney tailspin, a new student radicalism is emerging whose concerns include immigrants’ rights, global warming and the uncertainties facing debt-ridden graduates. Such considerations distinguish the new SDS from its historical namesake, which took shape in a very different context of economic affluence and establishment liberalism.

More on left & libertarian realignment

Friday, March 30th, 2007

News flash for libertarians — we’re all left-wingers now, whether you’re personally down with that or not. Why? The neo-conservatives have so thoroughly turned the right toward authoritarianism that any political outlook even remotely describable as “libertarian” is fundamentally alienated from the right at a foundational level. Small government conservatism is officially dead, and with it libertarian right-fusionism.

Glen Greenwald writing in Salon, Neoconservative radicalism has reshaped our political spectrum:

David Brooks’ column in The New York Times this morning contains several important observations. It would maximize clarity in our political discussions if journalists could just ingest Brooks’ central point: the dominant right-wing political movement in this country that has spawned and driven the Bush presidency has nothing to do with — it is in fact overtly hostile to — the ostensible principles of Goldwater/Reagan small-government conservatism. Though today’s so-called “conservatives” exploit the Goldwater/Reagan mythology as a political prop, they don’t believe in those principles in any way. That movement is the very antithesis [emphasis added — Brad] of those principles.

Brooks comes out and explicitly declares the twin icons of “conservatism” to be every bit as quaint and obsolete as the Geneva Conventions: “Goldwater and Reagan were important leaders, but they’re not models for the future.”

Brooks admits what has been crystal clear for some time — namely, that so-called “conservatives” (meaning the contemporary political “Right”) no longer believe (if they ever did) that government power should be restrained in order to maximize freedom. That belief system, says Brooks, is an obsolete relic which arose out of the the 1970s, and has been replaced by the opposite desire — for expanded government power on every front.

The arguably bright side of this is that left and right are becoming more like what principled radical libertarians like Karl Hess envisioned those terms ought to mean in the first place — re-alignment as clarification, as it were. For more in depth material along these lines, let me refer you to the web site of the Alliance of the Libertarian Left.

Site tweak for FS

Friday, March 30th, 2007

I’ve added a captcha form for user registration on the freedomSLUT bookmarking site. Here’s hoping that will help with the spam issue.

Don’t Ever Forget to Dream

Friday, March 30th, 2007

I was lucky enough to pick up a copy of The Early Ayn Rand during a recent visit to Lady Aster of San Francisco. If she is reading this than a hearty public thanks to her for the tour of Berkeley that landed us in the Other Change of Hobbit bookstore where I was able to get my hands on it.

Anyway, I found a passage in the collection that I really wanted to share:

“What do you dream of?” Kay Gonda, the actress, asks one of the characters, in the play’s thematic statement.
“Nothing,” he answers. “Of what account are dreams?”
“Of what account is life?”
“None. But who made it so?”
“Those who cannot dream.”
“No. Those who can only dream”

-Pg. 242 from The Early Ayn Rand: Revised Edition with a 2005 copyright attributed to the The Estate of Ayn Rand.

Reminds me of something Emma Goldman said…

“When we can’t dream any longer, we die”
-Emma Goldman

Follow your dreams!

Richman in Tbilisi; Luggage Not

Friday, March 30th, 2007

I arrived in Tbilisi, Georgia, on Wednesday, which is more than I can say for my luggage. Nevertheless, that is surely preferable to the other way around.

My lecture on market anarchism at the New Economic School in Tbilisi, Georgia, went very well. By that I mean I was happy with my presentation and I got several excellent questions from the 30-40 students.

We (FEE) begin a three-day student economics seminar today in Shindisi, outside Tbilisi. I'll lecture on private alternatives to the welfare state, free-market education, and the nature of taxation.

On Monday we head to Tsakhkadzor, Armenia, near the capital, Yerevan, to conduct another seminar.

It's cold and gray here. But I always enjoy coming to Georgia because the people are so warm. And it's great to see my liberal friends Paata Sheshelidze and Gia Jandieri of the New Economic School. That's Paata in the picture accepting the Atlas Foundation's 2006 Freda Utley Prize for Advancing Liberty. He and Gia, along with their colleagues, do an admirable job of promoting liberty in this formerly Soviet-held country.

Meanwhile, my luggage is on a world tour. I understand it was in Milan and Istanbul. Hopefully, Tbilisi is on the tour.

Congress, March 19-24

Friday, March 30th, 2007
My latest in the Last Week in Congress series is posted at DownsizeDC.org.

Gun Confiscation After Katrina

Friday, March 30th, 2007

Watch the video: The Untold Story of Gun Confiscation After Katrina

Hat tip to: Titanium Girl

Good news from Edward Abbey

Thursday, March 29th, 2007
This is Day 19 of our “purge,” all in preparation for tearing out the doggie-stained carpets and installing new flooring and built-in bookcases and cabinets in the next few months. Each day is filled with pleasant discoveries. One of today’s, found on a back shelf, is Edward Abbey’s Good News. Halleluiah! I had recently thought about revisiting Good News, and here it is!

Good News is widely considered one of Abbey’s lesser novels. It’s only natural, then, that of all his books, fiction and nonfiction, it’s my favorite. The “good news” for Abbey, when he wrote the novel in the late 1970s, was that the military-industrial state was bound to collapse eventually from its own weight. Good News is about what happens after that breakdown, when a paramilitary despot tries to restore “order” among the ruins of the Southwest and meets resistance from desert freedom-fighters. It’s about, as Abbey calls it, “the oldest civil war of all” — the city vs. the country. It’s tanks and grenades vs. horses and rifles. It’s the remnant of the power elite vs. the mind-your-own-business agrarians. It’s Them vs. Us. Good News is part sci-fi Western and part anarchist polemic. It’s largely forgotten but, thankfully, always in print. I can’t wait to dig into it again.

Here’s something Edward Abbey wrote in 1978, while he was working on Good News:

“We all know who the Enemy is. The Enemy speaks to us all the time — from the radio, on the television, on billboards, in the newspapers and slick magazines, in the halls of Congress, at the state capitol, in city hall.

“And the Enemy says, ‘Behold, how sleek and fat I have become. Am I not the wonder of the world? Am I not the richest and most powerful beast on earth? Would you turn against the thing which has enriched you, which has given you safety and security and comfort, which promises you still more wonders in the future — electronic toys, computerized thinking, a life air-conditioned from womb to grave, an existence of endless novelty, luxury, diversion, things and more things, a universe of sport and adventure and romance and travel in the softness of your armchair, the ease of your V-8 four-wheel-drive wheelchair tourism, the sedation of your living room? A painless, discreet, sedated death? And all this for so little, so very little — merely for the price of some of your independence, a bit of your freedom, a little part of your manhood or womanhood, for only a little sacrifice of your humanity and honor. ...’ ”

If you haven’t yet experienced Ed Abbey, Posted in Syndicated Articles | Comments Off

Economic Calculation in the Corporate Commonwealth

Thursday, March 29th, 2007
Part I: The Divorce of Entrepreneurial from Technical Knowledge
Part II: Hayek vs. Mises on Distributed Knowledge (Excerpt)
Part III: Rothbard's Application of the Calculation Argument to the Private Sector