Archive for March, 2008

Housekeeping mystery

Wednesday, March 26th, 2008
So, I've noticed that my last couple of posts use "millions" where "billions" should be. Thinking I just had some sort of brain fart, I went to correct them, but first decided to go back to the Word files I copied and pasted them from to see if I could catch any other blatant mistakes. Amazingly, I have "billions" in the Word files!

I honestly have no idea how this happened. It's obviously not some sort of conspiracy, given the absolutely trivial amount of traffic that comes here, but I just don't know how to explain this one. Oh well. I guess this serves as admission of the error of my original posts and notice of my subsequent edits.

Why the Peaceful Majority of Muslims Are Not Irrelevant

Wednesday, March 26th, 2008
A few years ago, FrontPageMag.com columnist Paul Marek wrote an article titled “Why the Peaceful Majority Is Irrelevant”. His thesis was that even if the majority of Muslims abhor violence, it doesn’t matter because “the fanatics rule Islam at this moment in history.... The hard quantifiable fact is, that the ‘peaceful majority’ is the ‘silent majority’ and it is cowed and extraneous.”

For Marek, the upshot is this: “We must pay attention to the only group that counts: the fanatics who threaten our way of life.”

He’s wrong. No, he’s worse than wrong, because his position could be used to justify mass murder.

The rest of my op-ed, "Why the Peaceful Majority of Muslims Are Not Irrelevant," is at The Future of Freedom Foundation website.

Atom

Next Discussion on Carnival of Anarchy

Tuesday, March 25th, 2008

I've put up another short post on Carnival of Anarchy, the group discussion blog for left libertarians. The suggestion is that contributors might like to repost their favourite article from their own websites and blogs on CofA and talk about why this is your best. It's just a idea ... perhaps you have some thoughts on this.

And now they bring up you.

Tuesday, March 25th, 2008

Here’s the opening of a MoveOn fundraising letter that I got just before going out of town last week. I’ve cut it off at the point where I stopped reading:

From: Nita Chaudhary, MoveOn.org Political Action <moveon-help@list.moveon.org>
Subject: 60 votes to win
Date: 3/19/2008 6:46 AM

Dear MoveOn member,

It’s happened again and again this year, on every issue we care about. Iraq. Health care. The climate crisis. Strong bills have sailed through the US House, only to stall in the face of Republican obstruction in the Senate. Republicans are on pace to double the Congressional record for the most filibusters.

Here’s the good news: Republicans are defending 23 Senate seats next year, compared to just 12 for the Democrats. Democrats could gain as many as 60 seats in the Senate, enough to break Republican filibusters and usher in a new era of progressive reform.

We’ve got a plan to take advantage of every seat that’s in play, make even more races competitive, and create a progressive majority that will last for a generation. But it’s going to take sustained support from you to pull it off and there’s no time to waste. Can you contribute $15 per month (you can cancel at any time) from now through Election Day?

Last year, the Senate Republicans obstructed numerous bills including stalling health insurance for the children who need it most and blocking a time-line to bring the troops home from Iraq.

Now look at some of the proposals from the Democratic presidential candidates that will almost certainly take 60 votes in the Senate to pass:

  • No more blank checks in Iraq

[…]

I stopped reading here because this is a lie.

It does not take 60 votes in the Senate to pass No more blank checks in Iraq. It does not take a filibuster-proof supermajority in the Senate — any more than it takes a veto-proof majority in the House — to halt blank-check funding for the Iraq War.

It doesn’t take positive legislation of any kind at all to halt funding for the Iraq War; all that it takes is a lack of any more laws to keep on funding it, whether in the form of regular budget line items or in the form of the repeated off-the-ledger infusions of cash which go to fund the Occupation’s perpetual state of emergency. Republican Senators can’t filibuster a non-bill and neither can President George W. Bush — or any President who might succeed him — veto it. It doesn’t take 60 Senators or 290 Representatives to stop bills from passing. All you need is a simple majority, which the Democrats already have, and have had for the last year and a half, and with which they have done worse than nothing over and over again.

The reason that those blank checks keep getting written, with Democrat Harry Reid and Democrat Nacy Pelosi’s signatures right by the X, is because the Democratic leadership, so-called, doesn’t give enough of a damn about ending the war to take on the political costs of blocking funding for it. The only reason that they could possibly think that doing what they want depends on having a larger majority than they already have is if what they want to do is something other than halting war funding.

The Democratic leadership clearly wants a larger majority in Congress, and they are going to keep on giving George Bush every dollar he asks for unless and until they get that larger majority. They don’t need the larger majority to stop sending him the money, so one of two things must be true. Either the Democratic leadership is waiting until they consolidate more political power so that they can pass a plan which will prolong the war rather than ending it, or else they are waiting until they consolidate more political power because they don’t want to end the war until after they’ve fully exploited it as a campaign issue in the upcoming Congressional and Presidential elections. In either case, the strategy is despicable. And in either case, it’s shameful to see a putatively antiwar group repeating their opportunistic lies.

No union with war-mongers, spiritually or politically.

Malcolm X: A Political Chump, from The Ballot or the Bullet

Further reading:

Yeah, that’s the free market at work, all right

Tuesday, March 25th, 2008
Want to know what nationalizing an “industry” looks like, USA-style?

http://www.independent.ie/business/world/fed-expands-role-by-aiding-jpmorgans-purchase-of-bear-stearns-1326899.html

The Federal Reserve has created a company to hold all the bad (read, value of zero dollars or less on the open market) assets that were held by Bear Stearns so that JP Morgan can buy the outstanding stock. There’s some mumbo jumbo about JP Morgan shouldering the first billion dollars in losses, but don’t be fooled – that won’t come to pass either. In any event, as Professor Joe Mason at Drexel University (props to a homie) says:

“``The Fed is so far outside the traditional bounds. It isn't innovative, it is taking a step back in time to a system of direct credit'' where the government decides ``who gets funding and who doesn't”

Not that this is really different from business as usual – the Fed indirectly controlled who got funding by controlling who was considered a primary dealer. But now the mask is off – the Fed, a mish-mash of the worst aspects of private and governmental interests (on the one hand, it is not democratically accountable in any even theoretically meaningful manner, but on the other, it is the recipient of state-granted privilege) is openly and directly supplying funding to their friends and colleagues.

More importantly, this whole transaction is not structured like a traditional loan. The new Fed created company will “borrow” 29 billion from the Fed, and 1 billion from JP Morgan. The company will then “send” (*&^% - even journalists who are trying to report on this stuff can’t be precise in their language, and I would bet that is because the Fed is using Newspeak about this transaction) 30 billion to JP Morgan in exchange for the toxic assets that sank Bear Stearns.

The assets at stake here – the Bear assets – are the equivalent of a lit piece of dynamite. You can easily assume that there are other lit sticks out there on wall street as well. You are seeing the beginning stages of a game like musical chairs. Wall street and big finance are all dancing around hoping to tie their pieces of dynamite to the chair occupied by people whose assets and income are denominated in dollars before the music stops. Sometimes, the dynamite will blow up before they can finish tying it, and one of them, like Bear Stearns, will be caught. This process is essentially a winnowing of the ruling class – power, money, and influence is being consolidated, with the lesser lights essentially getting a one way ticket out.

Don’t fret for the lesser lights, though. Notice how last week JP Morgan’s offer for Bear Stearns was for $2 a share? And yet sellers were having no problem selling Bear stock for approximately $4 a share. By the end of the week, there was some speculation about strange trades occurring, and sure enough, JP Morgan is upping its bid to $10 a share this week.

What happened was that insiders (probably those who really took a bath when Bears’s stick of dynamite blew) knew the price would go up, and so were willing to buy as much Bear stock as possible to book the profit. Insider trading at its finest, but you can rest assured the SEC won’t even investigate, because, well, regulation is only for the commoners.

So the lesser lights get bought off, and they’ll slink away quietly into lives of relatively powerless opulence, instead of fighting all the way down.

It is no longer (I’m not sure when it really was, but that’s another question entirely) the case that the U.S. financial system can be described as a market. It is now akin to Soviet committee meetings, where profits and losses are determined by political power and personal relationships to it.

ALL’s Well That Ends Well

Tuesday, March 25th, 2008

Alliance of the Libertarian Left I’m happy to report that all-left.net is back!

Yahoo explains (in rather awkward prose, but I’m not complaining):

I sincerely apologize for the inconvenience this has caused that your domain forwarding is not working and you are getting a paid ad site.

Roderick, I am sorry to inform you that we are experiencing technical problem due to which your were experiencing the problem.

I have now corrected the problem a and accessed your domain address and I was able to access your forwarded website without any problem.

Now I need to do some updating on that page; but sufficit diei malitia sua.

Only Americans Count

Tuesday, March 25th, 2008
The U.S. death toll in Iraq hit 4,000. You'd think there were no Iraqis or Iraqi casualties in Iraq.
Atom

Kansas City: candlelight vigil

Monday, March 24th, 2008

I just received the following e-mail:

Join with us
Tuesday, March 25
for our
Candlelight Vigil
Remembering 4000 American soldiers

7:00pm at JC Nichols Fountain
47th Street and Main, KCMO

Remembering, Honoring The Loss And Affirming That War Is Not The Answer

Clear evidence of the superiority of the anti-political approach

Monday, March 24th, 2008

Forget radical electoral politics. Look, most voters aren’t even remotely well-informed within the framework of mainstream political attitudes. If the folks in this video were judged solely on their knowledge of politics, it would be hard to look on them as anything other than drooling retards.

Among free-market libertarians, only the agorists have a way to develop a free society that does NOT involve trying to change folks into something they’re totally not — libertarian policy geeks who consistently vote the “right” way.

ALL My Base Are Belong To Them

Monday, March 24th, 2008

Alliance of the Libertarian LeftFor those following the saga of the missing all-left.net, which is supposed to forward to praxeology.net/all-left.htm, here’s an update, though not a particularly informative one. According to Yahoo’s control panel, I still own the all-left.net domain, I am fully paid up, and it is still forwarding to praxeology.net/all-left.htm. In fact, of course, it is forwarding to a paid ad site instead, despite Yahoo’s automated assurances to the contrary. So I have submitted a query to the actual humans in Yahoo’s customer care department. They’re supposed to get back to me within 24 hours. I await events.